"If the driveline on the A is properly restored to factory specs (keep in mind I'm not talking Judging Standards but Ford original specs for fit) it is a VERY reliable car."
This was a comment from a knowledgeable professional restorer, Kevin in NJ, and though I have heard similar comments before, this one caught my attention for the distinction drawn between Judging Standards and Ford specs.
I think this goes right to the heart of trying to define and determine what "restored" means. I have read more than a few stories about cars that were advertised and sold as complete restorations, and were later discovered to be accurate to the RG&JS, but mechanically not up to original Ford specs. I'm not talking about simply cosmetic restorations, but situations where, for a common example, the engine looked right but was not rebuilt properly, but only adequately, and maybe even never run. Or the shocks were correct, but only had nice paint because the owner never planned to drive the car anyway, only to just win a prize.
I am unlikely to ever buy another A, but I think this distinction is very important, and a good reminder for anyone who is looking to buy. In essence, it comes down to "don't buy a car for its paint job." If you want a reliable car you can drive all day, carefully consider the accuracy of the mechanics against Ford specs.
I know you seasoned A'ers know all this. And I know George and Herm and Brent and Tbird and Mitch (and many professional shops) work to this standard. But for those who are just getting into the Model A hobby, maybe this will help you look more closely and get you off to a good start.
This was a comment from a knowledgeable professional restorer, Kevin in NJ, and though I have heard similar comments before, this one caught my attention for the distinction drawn between Judging Standards and Ford specs.
I think this goes right to the heart of trying to define and determine what "restored" means. I have read more than a few stories about cars that were advertised and sold as complete restorations, and were later discovered to be accurate to the RG&JS, but mechanically not up to original Ford specs. I'm not talking about simply cosmetic restorations, but situations where, for a common example, the engine looked right but was not rebuilt properly, but only adequately, and maybe even never run. Or the shocks were correct, but only had nice paint because the owner never planned to drive the car anyway, only to just win a prize.
I am unlikely to ever buy another A, but I think this distinction is very important, and a good reminder for anyone who is looking to buy. In essence, it comes down to "don't buy a car for its paint job." If you want a reliable car you can drive all day, carefully consider the accuracy of the mechanics against Ford specs.
I know you seasoned A'ers know all this. And I know George and Herm and Brent and Tbird and Mitch (and many professional shops) work to this standard. But for those who are just getting into the Model A hobby, maybe this will help you look more closely and get you off to a good start.
Comment